China, 1944 - Taiwan, August 1944 KENJO MARU Tabular Record of Movement  - Luzon, 1944, 14th Area Army - July 1945, Babuyan Islands, 10th Area Army 61st Independent Mixed Brigade (Yoroi)


MVSYOFBT

Palau minor islands, Yap and Fais Island, May 1944

Jolo, 1944 IJA Transport MEXICO MARU: Tabular Record of Movement

Mudanjiang, August 1944 - Miyako-jima, September 1944 60th Independent Mixed Brigade (Koma)

Fuzhou, 1944 RISING STORM - THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY AND CHINA 1931-1941


Yamaguchi, 1944 - Amami Ōshima, 1945 64th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tama)


Hiroshima, 1941 - Guadalcanal, 1942 - Rabaul, 1944 65th Independent Mixed Brigade (Natsu)


1945, 6th army - August 1945, Nii-jima, 12th Area Army


August 1945, Hachijō-jima, 12th Area Army


Keelung, July 1944 - Leyte, December 1944 68th Independent Mixed Brigade (Hoshi)


Saigon, December 1944 - Malaysia, 1945, 29th Army 70th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kakan)


Kota Kinabalu, May 1944 - Kuching, February 1945 71st Independent Mixed Brigade (Kanto)


Thanbyuzayat, 1944 72nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Kantetsu)


Hengchun, 26 October 1944 Japanese Forces Formosa 1 January 1945 IJN Subchaser CH-38:Tabular Record of Movement  - Penghu, January 1945, 40th army - Hsinchu, June 1945 75th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kyo)


Keelung, January 1945, 10th Area Army 76th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tsu)


Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)


Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)


China, 1944 - Taiwan, August 1944 KENJO MARU Tabular Record of Movement  - Luzon, 1944, 14th Area Army - July 1945, Babuyan Islands, 10th Area Army 61st Independent Mixed Brigade (Yoroi)

Xiangtan, March 1945, 20th Army 81st Independent Mixed Brigade (Shikyo)


Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)


Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)


Fuzhou, 1944 RISING STORM - THE IMPERIAL JAPANESE NAVY AND CHINA 1931-1941

Yamaguchi, 1944 - Amami Ōshima, 1945 64th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tama)

Hiroshima, 1941 - Guadalcanal, 1942 - Rabaul, 1944 65th Independent Mixed Brigade (Natsu)

1945, 6th army - August 1945, Nii-jima, 12th Area Army

August 1945, Hachijō-jima, 12th Area Army

Keelung, July 1944 - Leyte, December 1944 68th Independent Mixed Brigade (Hoshi)

Saigon, December 1944 - Malaysia, 1945, 29th Army 70th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kakan)

Kota Kinabalu, May 1944 - Kuching, February 1945 71st Independent Mixed Brigade (Kanto)

Thanbyuzayat, 1944 72nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Kantetsu)

Hengchun, 26 October 1944 Japanese Forces Formosa 1 January 1945 IJN Subchaser CH-38:Tabular Record of Movement  - Penghu, January 1945, 40th army - Hsinchu, June 1945 75th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kyo)

Keelung, January 1945, 10th Area Army 76th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tsu)

Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)

Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)

Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)


Xiangtan, March 1945, 20th Army 81st Independent Mixed Brigade (Shikyo)

Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)

Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)

Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)


Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)


Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)


Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)


Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army


Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945


Saigon, December 1944 - Malaysia, 1945, 29th Army 70th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kakan)

Kota Kinabalu, May 1944 - Kuching, February 1945 71st Independent Mixed Brigade (Kanto)

Thanbyuzayat, 1944 72nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Kantetsu)

Hengchun, 26 October 1944 Japanese Forces Formosa 1 January 1945 IJN Subchaser CH-38:Tabular Record of Movement  - Penghu, January 1945, 40th army - Hsinchu, June 1945 75th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kyo)

Keelung, January 1945, 10th Area Army 76th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tsu)

Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)

Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)

Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)


Xiangtan, March 1945, 20th Army 81st Independent Mixed Brigade (Shikyo)

Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)

Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)

Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)

Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)

Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)

Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)

Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army

Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945

Datong, February 1945, 13th Army - Xuzhou, August 1945 92nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiken)


Thanbyuzayat, 1944 72nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Kantetsu)

Hengchun, 26 October 1944 Japanese Forces Formosa 1 January 1945 IJN Subchaser CH-38:Tabular Record of Movement  - Penghu, January 1945, 40th army - Hsinchu, June 1945 75th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kyo)

Keelung, January 1945, 10th Area Army 76th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tsu)

Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)

Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)

Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)


Xiangtan, March 1945, 20th Army 81st Independent Mixed Brigade (Shikyo)

Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)

Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)

Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)

Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)

Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)

Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)

Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army

Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945

Datong, February 1945, 13th Army - Xuzhou, August 1945 92nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiken)

6 February 1945, Tokyo - August 1945, Tateyama, Army of Tokyo Bay


Hengchun, 26 October 1944 Japanese Forces Formosa 1 January 1945 IJN Subchaser CH-38:Tabular Record of Movement  - Penghu, January 1945, 40th army - Hsinchu, June 1945 75th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kyo)

Keelung, January 1945, 10th Area Army 76th Independent Mixed Brigade (Tsu)

Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)

Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)

Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)


Kaohsiung, 1945, 10th Area Army 100th Independent Mixed Brigade (Banjaku)


Shibetsu, February 1945 - Hayakita, Hokkaido, 7 May 1945, 5th Area Army 101st Independent Mixed Brigade (Tatsu)


Mudanjiang, March 1945, 3rd Area Army 79th Independent Mixed Brigade (Jobu)

Hailar, April 1945 - Jalainur, August 1945, 4th Army 80th Independent Mixed Brigade (Eihou/Hikari)

Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)

Hualien, February 1945, 10th Area Army 102nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiman)


Xiangtan, March 1945, 20th Army 81st Independent Mixed Brigade (Shikyo)

Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)

Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)

Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)

Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)

Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)

Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)

Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army

Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945

Datong, February 1945, 13th Army - Xuzhou, August 1945 92nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiken)

6 February 1945, Tokyo - August 1945, Tateyama, Army of Tokyo Bay

Kaohsiung, 1945, 10th Area Army 100th Independent Mixed Brigade (Banjaku)

Shibetsu, February 1945 - Hayakita, Hokkaido, 7 May 1945, 5th Area Army 101st Independent Mixed Brigade (Tatsu)

Kaohsiung, February 1945, 10th Area Army - Taipei, May 1945 103rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiku)


Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)

Hualien, February 1945, 10th Area Army 102nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiman)

Yangon, February 1945 105th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kan'i)


Zhuzhou, March 1945, 20th Army 82nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiretsu)

Hankou, March 1945, 6th Area Army 83rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shimou)

Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)

Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)

Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)

Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)

Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army

Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945

Datong, February 1945, 13th Army - Xuzhou, August 1945 92nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiken)

6 February 1945, Tokyo - August 1945, Tateyama, Army of Tokyo Bay

Kaohsiung, 1945, 10th Area Army 100th Independent Mixed Brigade (Banjaku)

Shibetsu, February 1945 - Hayakita, Hokkaido, 7 May 1945, 5th Area Army 101st Independent Mixed Brigade (Tatsu)

Kaohsiung, February 1945, 10th Area Army - Taipei, May 1945 103rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiku)


Jiujiang, March 1945, 6th Area Army 84th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiyu)

Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)

Hualien, February 1945, 10th Area Army 102nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiman)

Yangon, February 1945 105th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kan'i)

Jejudo, April 1945, 58th Army 108th Independent Mixed Brigade (Sui)


Tanegashima, 1945, 57th Army Japanese 16th Army Homeland Defense June-August 1945


Yingcheng, March 1945, 6th Area Army 85th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiketsu)

Xiangxi, April 1945, 20th Army 86th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shusou)

Hengyang, April 1945, 20th Army 87th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shindo)

Guangxi, April 1945, 11th Army 88th Independent Mixed Brigade (Chuten)

Jinhua, August 1944 - Fenghua, August 1945, 6th Army

Yangzhou, February 1945, 10th army 90th Independent Mixed Brigade (Shinrai)  or 13th Army Japanese China Expeditionary Army Forces in China Late April 1945

Datong, February 1945, 13th Army - Xuzhou, August 1945 92nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Shiken)

6 February 1945, Tokyo - August 1945, Tateyama, Army of Tokyo Bay

Kaohsiung, 1945, 10th Area Army 100th Independent Mixed Brigade (Banjaku)

Shibetsu, February 1945 - Hayakita, Hokkaido, 7 May 1945, 5th Area Army 101st Independent Mixed Brigade (Tatsu)

Kaohsiung, February 1945, 10th Area Army - Taipei, May 1945 103rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiku)

Yilan, April 1945, 10th Area Army 112th Independent Mixed Brigade (Raijin)


Ningbo, February 1944, 6th Army 91st Independent Mixed Brigade (Chiku)

Hualien, February 1945, 10th Area Army 102nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Hachiman)

Yangon, February 1945 105th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kan'i)

Jejudo, April 1945, 58th Army 108th Independent Mixed Brigade (Sui)

Tanegashima, 1945, 57th Army Japanese 16th Army Homeland Defense June-August 1945


23 May 1945, Nagano- August 1945, Yokosuka, Army of Tokyo Bay


Gobō, Wakayama, 1945, 15th Area Army - Tokushima, August 1945, 55th Army


Gobō, Wakayama, 23 May 1945, 15th Area Army


Busan, May 1945 - Ulsan, August 1945 127th Independent Mixed Brigade (Sodan)


north-east Halmahera, May 1945 128th Independent Mixed Brigade (Kai)


Urup, 1945 129th Independent Mixed Brigade (Takane)


Liaoning, July 1945, 3rd Area Army 130th Independent Mixed Brigade (Fun'yaku)


Harbin, July 1945, 4th army 131st Independent Mixed Brigade (Funshin)


Dongning, July 1945, 3rd Army 132nd Independent Mixed Brigade (Funsen)


Siping, July 1945, 34th Army 133rd Independent Mixed Brigade (Fukuju)


Jinzhou, July 1945, 3rd Area Army 134th Independent Mixed Brigade (Funrei)  - Linjiang, August 1945


Aihui, July 1945, 4th Army 135th Independent Mixed Brigade (Fukyu)


Nencheng, July 1945 - Qiqihar, August 1945, 4th Army 136th Independent Mixed Brigade (Fun'yaku)


unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown

2007
Peugeot Sport España
Enrique García Ojeda
Safari Rally Kenya
TUR   3
BEL   2
RUS   2
POR   4
CZE   2
ITA   6
SWI   2
CHI
1st
47

2007
Peugeot Sport España
Nicolas Vouilloz
KEN
TUR   1
BEL   Ret
RUS   3
POR   9
CZE   1
ITA   3
SWI   1
CHI
2nd
42

2007
Peugeot Team Belux
Bernd Casier
Safari Rally Kenya
TUR
BEL   4
RUS
POR   5
CZE   5
ITA   14
SWI   Ret
CHI
8th
13

2008
Peugeot Team Bel-Lux
Nicolas Vouilloz
TUR   2
POR   3
BEL   2
RUS   5
POR   1
CZE   2
ESP   2
ITA   2
SWI   2
CHI
1st
68

2008
Peugeot Team Bel-Lux
Freddy Loix
IST   8
POR   Ret
YPR   1
RUS   4
MAD   6
ZLI   1
AST   3
SAN   5
VAL   1
CHN
2nd
48

2009
Peugeot UK
Kris Meeke
MON   Ret
CUR   1
KEN
AZO   1
BEL   1
RUS
POR   5
CZE   2
ESP   2
ITA   1
1st
66

2009
Peugeot Team Belux
Freddy Loix
MON   2
CUR   4
Safari Rally Kenya
AZO   4
YPR   3
RUS
MAD   6
ZLI   Ret
AST   6
ITA   4
3rd
37

2009
Peugeot Team Belux
Nicolas Vouilloz
MON   Ret
CUR   2
KEN
AZO   3
BEL   Ret
RUS
POR   4
CZE   Ret
ESP   3
ITA   3
4th
31

2009
Peugeot Team Belux
Pieter Tsjoen
77ème Rallye Automobile de Monte-Carlo
CUR
KEN
AZO
YPR   4
RUS
MAD
Barum Rally Zlin
AST
ITA
19th
5

2009
BF Goodrich Drivers Team
Sébastien Ogier
MON   1
CUR
Safari Rally Kenya
AZO
8th
10


2010
Peugeot UK
Kris Meeke
MON   Ret
BRA   1
ARG   Ret
CAN   4
ITA   Ret
BEL   Ret
AZO   2
MAD   Ret
CZE   4
ITA   4
3rd
39


2010
Peugeot Team Bel-Lux
Thierry Neuville
MON
BRA
ARG
CAN   Ret
ITA   4
BEL   3
AZO
MAD
CZE   Ret
ITA   8
9th
12


2011
Peugeot Team Bel-Lux
Thierry Neuville
MON   Ret
CAN   3
COR    1
YAL   6
YPR   Ret
AZO
ZLI   4
MEC   2
SAN    1
SCO    6
5th
115


2011
Peugeot UK
Guy Wilks
MON   3
CAN   5
COR   Ret
YAL   5
YPR   4
AZO   Ret
ZLI   Ret
MEC   Ret
SAN   Ret
SCO   Ret
7th
47


Simulated Armaments Transactions Prohibition Act, 1976

Transkei Constitution Amendment Act, 1976

Bantu Laws Amendment Act, 1976 (before 1978)    Black Laws Amendment Act, 1976 (after 1978)

Advertising on Roads and Ribbon Development Amendment Act, 1976

Railways and Harbours Acts Amendment Act, 1976

Railways and Harbours Additional Appropriation Act, 1976

Post Office Additional Appropriation Act, 1976


Hazardous Substances Amendment Act, 1976


Abortion and Sterilization Amendment Act, 1976


Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act, 1976


Regulation of Monopolistic Conditions Amendment Act, 1976


Iron and Steel Industry Amendment Act, 1976


Sale of Land on Instalments Amendment Act, 1976


Rural Coloured Areas Amendment Act, 1976


Coloured Persons Education Amendment Act, 1976


Coloured Persons in South-West Africa Education Amendment Act, 1976


Basters of Rehoboth Education Amendment Act, 1976


Nama in South-West Africa Education Amendment Act, 1976


Medical, Dental and Supplementary Health Service Professions Amendment Act, 1976


Petition Proceedings Replacement Act, 1976


Pre-Union Statute Law Revision Act, 1976


Scientific Research Council Amendment Act, 1976


National Road Safety Amendment Act, 1976


Mountain Catchment Areas Amendment Act, 1976


Railways and Harbours Appropriation Act, 1976


Railways and Harbours Finances and Accounts Act, 1976


Parliamentary and Provincial Medical Aid Scheme Amendment Act, 1976


Appeals from the Supreme Court of Transkei Act, 1976


Parliamentary Internal Security Commission Act, 1976


Wine, Other Fermented Beverages and Spirits Amendment Act, 1976


Wine and Spirit Control Amendment Act, 1976


National Supplies Procurement Amendment Act, 1976


Fuel Research Institute and Coal Amendment Act, 1976


Sishen-Saldanha Bay Railway Construction Amendment Act, 1976


Judges' Remuneration and Pensions Amendment Act, 1976


Saldanha Bay Harbour Construction Amendment Act, 1976


Medical University of Southern Africa Act, 1976


Gold Mines Assistance Amendment Act, 1976


War Damage Insurance and Compensation Act, 1976


Bantu Employees' In-Service Training Act, 1976 (before 1978)    Black Employees' In-Service Training Act, 1976 (after 1978)


Compulsory Motor Vehicle Insurance Amendment Act, 1976


Motor Carrier Transportation Amendment Act, 1976


Second Railways and Harbours Acts Amendment Act, 1976


Nuclear Installations (Licensing and Security) Amendment Act, 1976


Prevention of Illegal Squatting Amendment Act, 1976


Registration of Deeds in Rehoboth Act, 1976


Coloured Persons Representative Council Amendment Act, 1976


Second Coloured Persons Education Amendment Act, 1976


Public Service and Post Office Service Amendment Act, 1976


Saldanha Bay Harbour Acquisition and Equipment Act, 1976


Financial Institutions Amendment Act, 1976


Financial Arrangements with the Transkei Act, 1976


Second Unemployment Insurance Amendment Act, 1976


Bantu Trust and Land Amendment Act, 1976 (before 1978)    Development Trust and Land Amendment Act, 1976 (after 1978)


Estate Agents Act, 1976 (before 1999)    Estate Agency Affairs Act, 1976 (after 1999)


University of Port Elizabeth (Private) Amendment Act, 1976


South African Teachers' Council for Whites Act, 1976


MXJQCRPU

For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User:Lar/Accountability

File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.


Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.


Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.


RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.


Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.


Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).


One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.


For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User:Lar/Accountability

File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.


For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User:Lar/Accountability

File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D


For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User:Lar/Accountability

File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.


For now, I am committed to using the same process Lar has laid out so meticulously at User:Lar/Accountability

File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.


File an RFC; if that holds that there are concerns, I will submit to a reconfirmation-RFA; and if that fails, I will resign.  (May 2008; updated Sept. 2012)

Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.


Shame that something so simple has to be converted into party of the first part shall be referred to as the party of the first part..., but so it goes.

For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)


For now at least I am going to using the same processes that Lar has described. In a well explained process I might add. Simple

Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.


Pretty simple.  An admin conduct RfC can escalate into a recall if 4 users in good standing indicate I should resign.
:Added an alternate process that I stole from Ed Poor's RfA: I'll resign if 4 of my RFA supporters request it.

Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.


Admin recall should be a fairly simple process with minimal bureaucracy—i.e. not a big deal. Basic idea and formatting on my page is blatantly stolen from Shell Kinney. I hope I can simplify it further in the future.

Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.


Inspired by SirFozzie's criteria & process.

Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.


Home-grown, but Firsfron's simple criteria was the starting point.

Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.


Adapted from Alison (and, by extension, Lar and Fvasconcellos).

I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)


I'll stand for a reconfirmation RfA if a user I respect advises that I should.

Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.


Pretty straight-forward, and gives the requesting editor a decent shot at having me de-sysopped if I deserve it.

Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.


Fetchcomms
criteria
process
Not to be abused.

Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.


Start an RFC-like discussion.  If there is significant consensus that I've been misusing the tools and should give them up, that's what I'll do.

RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.


RfC-based process with an initial talkpage phase.

Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron


Based kinda loosely on Lar's - and I swear on pain of indefinite blocking that I shall abide by that process should it be started.

Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.


Admin user conduct RfC (inspired by Barneca).

One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU


One initiator, two certifiers, and then a 2-week RfA-like discussion.

Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU

xDanielx
criteria and process
criteria and process
Fairly typical; involves RFCU


Marked as temporary pending a formal arbitrator recall process, eligibility is from functionaries, supporters, or those who have made significant contributions to Wikisource, once 5 eligible ask, steps down as arb and stands for new RfA.

Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU

xDanielx
criteria and process
criteria and process
Fairly typical; involves RFCU


Designed by taking those of EVula, SirFozzie and Lar and smushing them together. :D

Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU

xDanielx
criteria and process
criteria and process
Fairly typical; involves RFCU


Lar's process seems fine for now. Should I find a better one, or a wider consensus emerge, I reserve the right to change my choice.

Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU

xDanielx
criteria and process
criteria and process
Fairly typical; involves RFCU


Very simple; the basic idea is borrowed from Shell Kinney.

Kwsn
criteria
process
Simply using Lar's method.

Composed after reviewing the work of other admins in the category, but is especially based on the subpages created by Lar and Alison (whose in turn is based on Fvasconcellos's)

Mtmelendez
criteria
process
It's simpler than it looks.

Like Pedro's but with a longer self-selected list of potential participants.

I am comfortable with what Lar has put together, may customize my criteria in the future.

I plan to write my own criteria at some point, but until then, I will use Lar's.

I will voluntarily relinquish all administrative privileges if petitioned to by four members in good standing.

Not as liberal as I'd like it to be, I'll try revising it in the coming days. Any feedback welcome :)

Royalguard11
criteria
process
To the point I think.

Sean William
criteria
process
Short, simple, to the point.

Should be relatively simple...actually a combination of User:David Fuchs's and User:Husond's criteria.

Will resign or start an RfC.  Consensus will be judged by an uninvolved trusted user selected by the clerk.

Tim Vickers
criteria
process
Simple approach from Firsfron

My own distinct criteria and process. I will step down on the request of any three users in good standing.

Blatantly stolen from AGK involving RFCU

xDanielx
criteria and process
criteria and process
Fairly typical; involves RFCU


MYUVPJUX

unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown unknown

AMC-21
the US of A
GE Americom
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active


International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation


Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active


International Telecommunications Satellite Organization


Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active


Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active


MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active


AMC-21
the US of A
GE Americom
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


AMC-21
the US of A
GE Americom
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired


AMC-21
the US of A
GE Americom
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


AMC-21
the US of A
GE Americom
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


Amazonas 4A
Spain
Hispasat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


Azerspace-1/Africasat-1a
az
Azercosmos
Communications
24 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active


Eutelsat 5 West B
International
Eutelsat
Communications
35 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 4
Active

Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


Galaxy 12
United States
Pan American Satellite Corporation
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane V
Active

Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active


Galaxy 14
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Soyuz-FG
Active

Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)


Galaxy 15
United States
PanAmSat
Television broadcasting
20-24 C-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active


C-band, Ku-band, Ka-band,   and WAAS payload

Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active


Horizons-2
United States, Japan
PanAmSat, SKY Perfect JSAT
Communications
20 Ku-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Sky-Mexico 1
Mexico
DirecTV
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band, 2 R-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


HYLAS 2
United Kingdom
Avanti Communications
Satellite internet
24 Ka-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Sky-Mexico 1
Mexico
DirecTV
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band, 2 R-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Star One C3
Brazil
Star One
Communications
28 C-band, 16 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active


Intelsat 11
United States
Intelsat
Communications
16 C-band, 18 Ka-band
Ariane 5 rocket
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Sky-Mexico 1
Mexico
DirecTV
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band, 2 R-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Star One C3
Brazil
Star One
Communications
28 C-band, 16 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Telkom-2
Indonesia
Telkom Indonesia
Communications
24 C-band
Ariane V
Retired


International Telecommunications Satellite Corporation

Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Sky-Mexico 1
Mexico
DirecTV
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band, 2 R-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Star One C3
Brazil
Star One
Communications
28 C-band, 16 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Telkom-2
Indonesia
Telkom Indonesia
Communications
24 C-band
Ariane V
Retired

Thaicom 6
Thailand
Thaicom
Communications
24 C-band, 9 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active


Intelsat 16
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 1
Active

International Telecommunications Satellite Organization

Intelsat 23
United States
Intelsat
Communications
24 C-band, 15 Ku-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

Koreasat 6
South Korea
KT Corporation
Television broadcasting
30 Ku-band
Ariane V
Active

MEASAT-3a
Malaysia
MEASAT Satellite Systems
Television broadcasting
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Zenit-3SLB
Active

Mexsat-3
Mexico
Mexican Satellite System
Mobile communications
12 C-band, 12 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

N-STAR c
Japan
NTT Docomo
Mobile communications
1 C-band, 20 S-band
Ariane 5 G
Retired

New Dawn
United States
Intelsat
Television broadcasting
28 C-band, 24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

NSS-9
Netherlands
SES World Skies
Communications
28 C-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D1
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Optus D2
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 GS
Active

Optus D3
Australia
Optus
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

SES-1
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 2
Active

SES-2 and CHIRP   (Commercially Hosted InfraRed Payload)

SES-3
United States
SES Americom
Communications
24 C-band, 24 Ku-band, 2 Ka-band
Proton-M   Phase 3
Active

SES-8
Luxembourg
SES
Television broadcasting
33 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Sky-Mexico 1
Mexico
DirecTV
Television broadcasting
24 Ku-band, 2 R-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Star One C3
Brazil
Star One
Communications
28 C-band, 16 Ku-band
Ariane 5 ECA
Active

Telkom-2
Indonesia
Telkom Indonesia
Communications
24 C-band
Ariane V
Retired

Thaicom 6
Thailand
Thaicom
Communications
24 C-band, 9 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active

Thaicom 8
Thailand
Thaicom
Communications
24 Ku-band
Falcon 9
Active